linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the crypto tree with the net-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <28626.1457348905@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 07 Mar 2016 11:08:25 +0000
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the crypto tree with the net-next tree

Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Today's linux-next merge of the crypto tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   net/rxrpc/rxkad.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   0d12f8a4027d ("rxrpc: Keep the skb private record of the Rx header in host byte order")
> 
> from the net-next tree and commit:
> 
>   1afe593b4239 ("rxrpc: Use skcipher")
> 
> from the crypto tree.

What's the best way to deal with this?  Should I take Herbert's

	[PATCH 18/26] rxrpc: Use skcipher

patch into my rxrpc tree also and pass it on to Dave?

David