[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56DDDA78.2070106@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 12:46:00 -0700
From: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, luto@...capital.net
Cc: dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, rob.gardner@...cle.com,
corbet@....net, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
dingel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, bob.picco@...cle.com,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
aarcange@...hat.com, arnd@...db.de, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
mhocko@...e.cz, chris.hyser@...cle.com, richard@....at,
vbabka@...e.cz, koct9i@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
gthelen@...gle.com, jack@...e.cz, xiexiuqi@...wei.com,
Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com, luto@...nel.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
bsegall@...gle.com, geert@...ux-m68k.org, dave@...olabs.net,
adobriyan@...il.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity
(ADI)
On 03/07/2016 12:22 PM, David Miller wrote:
> Khalid, maybe you should share notes with the folks working on x86
> protection keys.
>
Good idea. Sparc ADI feature is indeed similar to x86 protection keys
sounds like.
Thanks,
Khalid
Powered by blists - more mailing lists