lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160307041041.GB11604@treble.hsd1.ky.comcast.net>
Date:	Sun, 6 Mar 2016 22:10:41 -0600
From:	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To:	Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc:	Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>, sjenning@...hat.com,
	vojtech@...e.com, pmladek@...e.cz, mpe@...erman.id.au,
	live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] klp: remove superfluous errors in asm/livepatch.h

On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 10:13:56PM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2016, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> 
> > > There is an #error in asm/livepatch.h for both x86 and s390 in
> > > !CONFIG_LIVEPATCH cases. It does not make much sense as pointed out by
> > > Michael Ellerman. One can happily include asm/livepatch.h with
> > > CONFIG_LIVEPATCH. Remove it as useless.
> > > 
> > > Suggested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
> > > Signed-off-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
> > 
> > Looks fine to me.  
> 
> Thanks. I consider this to be your Ack then :) (if you disagree, please 
> shout loudly).

:-)

Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>

> 
> > While we're at it, do we even need the '#ifdef CONFIG_LIVEPATCH' in 
> > these files?  And in include/linux/livepatch.h?
> 
> You are right, this seems indeed completely unnecessary. I'll remove it 
> for 4.6 as well, if noone has any objections.

-- 
Josh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ