[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNASi381k5H3usDj1oLr=uzn7VTMS1jquSVaVEjd5JxWt_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 14:54:54 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Wei Xu <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>,
"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>,
David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com>,
linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: add "simple-bus" to "arm, amba-bus" compatible nodes
Hi Rob, Mark, Jon,
Setting aside the future plan, anyway we should avoid
relying on an undocumented compatible string.
(and we should avoid its spread as Rob pointed out.)
I rephrase the git-log (no update in the code-diff).
Could you check v2, please?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8529701/
Better?
2016-03-04 5:23 GMT+09:00 Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 4:12 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) <tixy@...aro.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 12:07 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> [...]
>>> This patch is derived from Rob Herring' comment
>>> "BTW, we should also kill off "amba-bus" which is an ambiguous term"
>>> in the following thread:
>>> http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1601.0/01822.html
>>>
>>>
>>> So, the plan would be like this:
>>>
>>> [1] Make device trees not depend on "arm,amba-bus" (this commit)
>>> [2] New device trees should no longer use "arm,amba-bus" alone.
>>> [3] Go though some releases until we do not care about the backward
>>> compatibility
>>
>> Why would we stop caring about backwards compatibility? If I was a user
>> of any of the platforms in question and updated my kernel, I wouldn't
>> expect to have to debug why it was broken, then install a new dtb to fix
>> it - which may be a tricky thing to do, depending on the firmware used
>> to boot Linux.
>
> If no one notices, then there is no ABI. Things break all the time
> when nobody cares. It will be more than a few releases for sure. We
> may never get to step 3, but we should do step 1 so people stop
> copy-n-pasting this in step 2.
>
> Rob
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists