linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] EDAC, sb_edac: Fixed logic error in sb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160308102809.GC16568@pd.tnic>
Date:	Tue, 8 Mar 2016 11:28:09 +0100
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	"Chrzaniuk, Hubert" <hubert.chrzaniuk@...el.com>
Cc:	"Anaczkowski, Lukasz" <lukasz.anaczkowski@...el.com>,
	"mchehab@....samsung.com" <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
	"dougthompson@...ssion.com" <dougthompson@...ssion.com>,
	"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] EDAC, sb_edac: Fixed logic error in sb_edac driver

On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 09:18:33AM +0000, Chrzaniuk, Hubert wrote:
> Yes, that’s right:
> 1. d0cdf9003140 is the patch I am referring to
> 2. EDAC for KNL platform on 4.5 will not cause any problems but will not be functional for DIMMs (only for MCDRAM)

Ok, thanks for confirming.

> Thanks, that is a valid point, it will be refactored in a separate
> patch. However it would good to fix what we have now, so I still hope
> to have the patch merged anyway...

Of course - it is too late for cleanups anyway. I was suggesting that
you guys put it on your radar and start cleaning it up at some point,
when you get a chance. It is a low prio thing and can wait.

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.