[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160308154838.GG2243@p310>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 17:48:38 +0200
From: Petko Manolov <petkan@...-labs.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 12/12] IMA: Use the the system trusted keyrings
instead of .ima_mok [ver #2]
On 16-03-08 14:44:24, David Howells wrote:
> Petko Manolov <petkan@...-labs.com> wrote:
>
> > I would suggest leaving (1) and (3).
>
> Do you mean dropping option (2) and leaving (1) and (3)? Or do you mean
> dropping options (1) and (3)?
Dropping option (2) and leaving (1) and (3).
(2) is subset of (3) and IMHO adds unnecessary complexity.
Petko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists