lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 9 Mar 2016 21:44:28 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] perf tools: Fix command line filters in hierarchy
 mode

Hi Jiri,

On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 10:13:56AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 12:06:40AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > When a command-line filter was applied in hierarchy mode, output was
> > broken especially when filtering on lower level.  The higher level
> > entries didn't show up so it's hard to see the result.
> > 
> > Also it needs to handle multi sort keys in a single level of hierarchy.
> > 
> > Before:
> > 
> >   $ perf report --hierarchy -s 'cpu,{dso,comm}' --comms swapper --stdio
> >   ...
> >   #    Overhead  CPU / Shared Object+Command
> >   # ...........  ...........................
> >   #
> >          13.79%     [kernel.vmlinux]  swapper
> >       31.71%     000
> >          13.80%     [kernel.vmlinux]  swapper
> >           0.43%     [e1000e]          swapper
> >          11.89%     [kernel.vmlinux]  swapper
> >           9.18%     [kernel.vmlinux]  swapper
> > 
> > After:
> > 
> >   #    Overhead  CPU / Shared Object+Command
> >   # ...........  ...............................
> >   #
> >       33.09%     003
> >          13.79%     [kernel.vmlinux]  swapper
> >       31.71%     000
> >          13.80%     [kernel.vmlinux]  swapper
> >           0.43%     [e1000e]          swapper
> >       21.90%     002
> >          11.89%     [kernel.vmlinux]  swapper
> >       13.30%     001
> >           9.18%     [kernel.vmlinux]  swapper
> 
> I'm getting funny numbers when using 'F' toggle in tui mode 
> 
> [jolsa@...va perf]$ ./perf report --hierarchy -s 'cpu,{dso,comm}' --comms swapper 
> 
> Samples: 254  of event 'cycles:pp', Event count (approx.): 132263887
>  Overhead     CPU / Shared Object+Command                                                                                                                     ◆
> + 69.85%      001                                                                                                                                             ▒
> + 44.28%      000                                                                                                                                             ▒
> + 41.62%      002                                                                                                                                             ▒
> + 36.80%      003                                                                                                                                             
> 
> 
> [jolsa@...va perf]$ sudo ./perf top --hierarchy -s 'cpu,{dso,comm}' --comms swapper 
> 
>  Overhead     CPU / Shared O+Command
> + 320.64%     000
> + 179.91%     002
> + 137.05%     003
> + 88.37%      001

Hmm.. I think it's because that the total period is a sum of periods
of leaf nodes.  But if a filter is applied, sum of periods of upper
level entries can be different than sum of the lower level entries.
So it should use top-level entries periods instead IMHO.

I will send a fix.

Thanks,
Namhyung

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ