[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56E28A69.9040409@hisilicon.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 17:05:45 +0800
From: Chen Feng <puck.chen@...ilicon.com>
To: yalin wang <yalin.wang2010@...il.com>,
Lu Bing <albert.lubing@...ilicon.com>
CC: <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <arve@...roid.com>,
<riandrews@...roid.com>, <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
<suzhuangluan@...ilicon.com>, <yudongbin@...ilicon.com>,
<xuyiping@...ilicon.com>, <chenxiang9@...wei.com>,
<oliver.fu@...ilicon.com>, <liuzixing@...wei.com>,
<shimingxing@...ilicon.com>, <alan.wei@...ilicon.com>,
<saberlily.xia@...ilicon.com>, <dan.zhao@...ilicon.com>,
<linuxarm@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] android: lmk: add swap pte pmd in tasksize
On 2016/3/11 15:30, yalin wang wrote:
>
>> On Mar 11, 2016, at 15:23, Lu Bing <albert.lubing@...ilicon.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: l00215322 <albert.lubing@...ilicon.com>
>>
>> Many android devices have zram,so we should add "MM_SWAPENTS" in tasksize.
>> Refer oom_kill.c,we add pte&pmd also.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Chen Feng <puck.chen@...ilicon.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Fu Jun <oliver.fu@...ilicon.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Xu YiPing <xuyiping@...ilicon.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Yu DongBin <yudongbin@...ilicon.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lu Bing <albert.lubing@...ilicon.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c | 4 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c b/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
>> index 8b5a4a8..0817d3b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
>> @@ -139,7 +139,9 @@ static unsigned long lowmem_scan(struct shrinker *s, struct shrink_control *sc)
>> task_unlock(p);
>> continue;
>> }
>> - tasksize = get_mm_rss(p->mm);
>> + tasksize = get_mm_rss(p->mm) +
>> + get_mm_counter(p->mm, MM_SWAPENTS) +
>> + atomic_long_read(&p->mm->nr_ptes) + mm_nr_pmds(p->mm);
> why not introduce a mm_nr_ptes() help function here ?
> more clear to see .
>
Since the code is in staging, we can add another patch to do this.
>> task_unlock(p);
>> if (tasksize <= 0)
>> continue;
>> --
>> 1.8.3.2
>>
>
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists