linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 01/13] pinctrl: sunxi: Add A83T R

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 12 Mar 2016 12:48:02 +0800
From:	Vishnu Patekar <vishnupatekar0510@...il.com>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Jon Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Paweł Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	"ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Emilio Lopez <emilio@...pez.com.ar>,
	Jens Kuske <jenskuske@...il.com>,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	Reinder de Haan <patchesrdh@...as.com>,
	linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/13] pinctrl: sunxi: Add A83T R_PIO controller support

Hello Linus,


On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Vishnu Patekar
> <vishnupatekar0510@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> The A83T has R_PIO pin controller, it's same as A23, execpt A83T
>> interrupt bit is 6th and A83T has one extra pin PL12.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vishnu Patekar <vishnupatekar0510@...il.com>
>> Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>
> As partly noted by others:
>
>> +config PINCTRL_SUN8I_A83T_R
>> +       def_bool MACH_SUN8I
>
> bool
>
>> +       depends on RESET_CONTROLLER
>
> Should it rather select RESET_CONTROLLER?
I used depends on and def_bool as it is used for other sunxi pinctrl drivers.
Using bool and select will not harm anything.
Should I change it to bool and select ?  or keep it to be uniform with
earlier options?
>
>> +static const struct of_device_id sun8i_a83t_r_pinctrl_match[] = {
>> +       { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a83t-r-pinctrl", },
>> +       {}
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sun8i_a83t_r_pinctrl_match);
>
> Module talk in bool driver.
I'll remove it.
>
>> +static struct platform_driver sun8i_a83t_r_pinctrl_driver = {
>> +       .probe  = sun8i_a83t_r_pinctrl_probe,
>> +       .driver = {
>> +               .name           = "sun8i-a83t-r-pinctrl",
>> +               .of_match_table = sun8i_a83t_r_pinctrl_match,
>> +       },
>> +};
>> +module_platform_driver(sun8i_a83t_r_pinctrl_driver);
>
> Should be builtin?
Yes, It should be. I missed Maxime's earlier commets.
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij