[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160314105208.GM8418@lukather>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:52:08 +0100
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Vishnu Patekar <vishnupatekar0510@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Jon Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Paweł Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Emilio Lopez <emilio@...pez.com.ar>,
Jens Kuske <jenskuske@...il.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Reinder de Haan <patchesrdh@...as.com>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/13] pinctrl: sunxi: Add A83T R_PIO controller
support
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 12:48:02PM +0800, Vishnu Patekar wrote:
> Hello Linus,
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Vishnu Patekar
> > <vishnupatekar0510@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> >> The A83T has R_PIO pin controller, it's same as A23, execpt A83T
> >> interrupt bit is 6th and A83T has one extra pin PL12.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Vishnu Patekar <vishnupatekar0510@...il.com>
> >> Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
> >> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> >
> > As partly noted by others:
> >
> >> +config PINCTRL_SUN8I_A83T_R
> >> + def_bool MACH_SUN8I
> >
> > bool
> >
> >> + depends on RESET_CONTROLLER
> >
> > Should it rather select RESET_CONTROLLER?
> I used depends on and def_bool as it is used for other sunxi pinctrl drivers.
> Using bool and select will not harm anything.
It will, at least in the case of def_bool, since that symbol will not
be enabled by default, and you'll have no way to enable it.
And RESET_CONTROLLER is a bit messy, since you can't just select it
because it also has a dependency on an ARCH_HAS_RESET_CONTROLLER
symbol.
> Should I change it to bool and select ? or keep it to be uniform with
> earlier options?
Please keep it that way.
Thanks,
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists