linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/dsi: fix definition of msm_dsi_pll_28nm_8960

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Mar 2016 06:51:17 -0400
From:	Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
To:	Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@...aro.org>
Cc:	Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org>,
	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/dsi: fix definition of msm_dsi_pll_28nm_8960_init()

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 3:59 AM, Kieran Bingham
<kieran.bingham@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 14/03/16 01:07, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Kieran Bingham
>> <kieran.bingham@...aro.org> wrote:
>>> On 04/02/16 05:09, Archit Taneja wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 02/03/2016 07:55 PM, Luis Henriques wrote:
>>>>> This fixes the following build failure:
>>>>>
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/pll/dsi_pll_28nm.o: In function
>>>>> `msm_dsi_pll_28nm_8960_init':
>>>>> dsi_pll_28nm.c:(.text+0x1198): multiple definition of
>>>>> `msm_dsi_pll_28nm_8960_init'
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/pll/dsi_pll.o:dsi_pll.c:(.text+0x0): first
>>>>> defined here
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the fix.
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org>
>>>>
>>>> Dave,
>>>>
>>>> Could you please queue this for the next -rc cycle since it causes a
>>>> build break?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I've just hit this build break on v4.5-rc7 ... was there any progress
>>> getting this fix in ? I can't see any further reference to this thread
>>> on LKML.
>>>
>>> Just to note, changing to a static generates a build-warning for me:
>>>
>>>   CC      drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/pll/dsi_pll_28nm.o
>>> In file included from
>>> sources/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/pll/dsi_pll_28nm.c:17:0:
>>> sources/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/pll/dsi_pll.h:100:28: warning:
>>> ‘msm_dsi_pll_28nm_8960_init’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>>>  static struct msm_dsi_pll *msm_dsi_pll_28nm_8960_init(struct
>>> platform_device *pdev,
>>>                             ^
>>
>> oh, the patch to change it to static inline was in my pull req for
>> 4.6, but perhaps this should have been sent as a -fixes pull for 4.5?
>> Dave, if you are sending another -fixes pull for 4.5 could you include
>> this?
>
> I see a shiny new v4.5 tag this morning, so I guess we don't need to
> worry about getting in there. Is it worth sending to -stable?
>

yeah, I think -stable material

BR,
-R