[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160315102631.GA27227@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:26:31 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
xen-devel <Xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] x86/msr: Carry on after a non-"safe" MSR access
fails without !panic_on_oops
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> * Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Linus Torvalds
> > <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> The code in my queue is, literally:
> > >>
> > >> bool ex_handler_rdmsr_unsafe(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup,
> > >> struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
> > >> {
> > >> WARN_ONCE(1, "unchecked MSR access error: RDMSR from 0x%x",
> > >> (unsigned int)regs->cx);
> > >>
> > >> /* Pretend that the read succeeded and returned 0. */
> > >> regs->ip = ex_fixup_addr(fixup);
> > >> regs->ax = 0;
> > >> regs->dx = 0;
> > >> return true;
> > >> }
> > >> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ex_handler_rdmsr_unsafe);
> > >
> > > I guess I can live with this, as long as we also extend the
> > > early-fault handling to work with the special exception handlers.
> >
> > OK, will do. I need to rewrork the early IDT code a bit so it
> > generates a real pt_regs layout, but that's arguably a cleanup anyway.
>
> Ok, with that's I'm pretty happy about it as well.
Note, I think it's pretty clear at this point that this is v4.7 material.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists