lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 08:45:14 -0700 From: Jeremy Allison <jra@...ba.org> To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> Cc: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>, Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>, Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, XFS Developers <xfs@....sgi.com>, Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>, linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 00/22] Richacls (Core and Ext4) On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 12:11:03AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 05:11:51PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > > > while breaking a lot of assumptions, > > > > The model is designed specifically to be compliant with the POSIX > > permission model. What assumptions are you talking about? > > People have long learned that we only have 'alloc' permissions. Any > model that mixes allow and deny ACE is a mistake. People can also learn and change though :-). One of the biggest complaints people deploying Samba on Linux have is the incompatible ACL models. Whilst I have sympathy with your intense dislike of the Windows ACL model, this comes down to the core of "who do we serve ?" IMHO we should serve the users (although I must confess I'd look awful in a TRON suit :-).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists