[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160317113507.GH18212@e106622-lin>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:35:07 +0000
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/7][Update] cpufreq: Support for fast frequency
switching
Hi,
On 17/03/16 00:51, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: Support for fast frequency switching
>
[...]
> +void cpufreq_enable_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> +{
> + lockdep_assert_held(&policy->rwsem);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&cpufreq_fast_switch_lock);
> + if (policy->fast_switch_possible && cpufreq_fast_switch_count >= 0) {
> + cpufreq_fast_switch_count++;
> + policy->fast_switch_enabled = true;
> + } else {
> + pr_warn("cpufreq: CPU%u: Fast freqnency switching not enabled\n",
Ultra-minor nit: s/freqnency/frequency/
Also, is this really a warning or just a debug message? (everything
seems to work fine on Juno even if this is printed :-)).
Best,
- Juri
Powered by blists - more mailing lists