lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1agWMm-0001yL-8S@debutante>
Date:	Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:45:24 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Mihai Mihalache <mihai.d.mihalache@...el.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Applied "regulator: gpio: check return value of of_get_named_gpio" to the regulator tree

The patch

   regulator: gpio: check return value of of_get_named_gpio

has been applied to the regulator tree at

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From 8d48794bb3bf7d7e421204a8cc3bd5c95ffc609b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mihai Mihalache <mihai.d.mihalache@...el.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 08:21:12 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: gpio: check return value of of_get_named_gpio

At boot time the regulator driver can be initialized before the
gpio, in which case the call to of_get_named_gpio will return
EPROBE_DEFER. This value is silently passed to regulator_register
which will return success, although the gpio is not registered
(regulator_ena_gpio_request not called) as the value passed is
detected as invalid. The gpio_regulator_probe will therefore
succeed win no gpio requested.

Signed-off-by: Mihai Mihalache <mihai.d.mihalache@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans Holmberg <hans.holmberg@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/regulator/gpio-regulator.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/gpio-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/gpio-regulator.c
index a8718e98674a..83e89e5d4752 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/gpio-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/gpio-regulator.c
@@ -162,6 +162,8 @@ of_get_gpio_regulator_config(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np,
 	of_property_read_u32(np, "startup-delay-us", &config->startup_delay);
 
 	config->enable_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "enable-gpio", 0);
+	if (config->enable_gpio == -EPROBE_DEFER)
+		return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
 
 	/* Fetch GPIOs. - optional property*/
 	ret = of_gpio_count(np);
-- 
2.7.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ