[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17085043.8Me19Fq1r8@wuerfel>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 18:01:23 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, timur@...eaurora.org,
cov@...eaurora.org, nwatters@...eaurora.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
"Suthikulpanit, Suravee" <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>,
Dean Nelson <dnelson@...hat.com>,
"Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dma-mapping: fix dma_to_phys API for IOMMU attached devices
On Thursday 17 March 2016 12:36:28 Sinan Kaya wrote:
>
> The first solution that comes to my mind is to implement a weak function in
> swiotlb.c with these contents
>
> dma_addr_t __weak swio_phys_to_dma(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t paddr)
> {
> return paddr;
> }
>
>
> phys_addr_t __weak swio_dma_to_phys(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t daddr)
> {
> return daddr;
> }
>
> then clean up all the duplicates in dma-mapping.h for all ARCHs that have
> identical code.
>
> For others move the implementation to some source file.
>
>
Sounds ok to me, but I'd prefer using a macro instead of a __weak symbol:
#ifndef swiotlb_phys_to_dma
static inline dma_addr_t swiotlb_phys_to_dma(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t paddr)
{
return paddr;
}
#endif
and then let the architectures that override it provide a self-referencing
macro:
#define swiotlb_phys_to_dma swiotlb_phys_to_dma
Also note swiotlb instead of swio, to match the existing naming.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists