[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160318103418.GA2531@piout.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:34:18 +0100
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
Cc: nicolas.ferre@...el.com, plagnioj@...osoft.com,
boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: at91: use chipid device for soc detection
On 18/03/2016 at 08:21:19 +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote :
> So far, the CIDR and EXID registers were in the DBGU interface. This device
> has disappeared with the SAMA5D2 family. These registers are exposed
> through a new device called chipid.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
> [nicolas.ferre@...el.com: remove useless warnings]
Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt | 4 ++
> arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt
> index 7fd64ec..0b1fcbf 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt
> @@ -41,6 +41,10 @@ compatible: must be one of:
> - "atmel,sama5d43"
> - "atmel,sama5d44"
>
> +Chipid required properties:
> +- compatible: Should be "atmel,sama5d2-chipid"
> +- reg : Should contain registers location and length
> +
> PIT Timer required properties:
> - compatible: Should be "atmel,at91sam9260-pit"
> - reg: Should contain registers location and length
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c
> index 54343ff..034d563 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c
> @@ -22,48 +22,93 @@
> #include "soc.h"
>
> #define AT91_DBGU_CIDR 0x40
> -#define AT91_DBGU_CIDR_VERSION(x) ((x) & 0x1f)
> -#define AT91_DBGU_CIDR_EXT BIT(31)
> -#define AT91_DBGU_CIDR_MATCH_MASK 0x7fffffe0
> #define AT91_DBGU_EXID 0x44
> +#define AT91_CHIPID_CIDR 0x00
> +#define AT91_CHIPID_EXID 0x04
> +#define AT91_CIDR_VERSION(x) ((x) & 0x1f)
> +#define AT91_CIDR_EXT BIT(31)
> +#define AT91_CIDR_MATCH_MASK 0x7fffffe0
>
> -struct soc_device * __init at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc *socs)
> +int __init at91_get_cidr_exid_from_dbgu(u32 *cidr, u32 *exid)
> {
> - struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
> - const struct at91_soc *soc;
> - struct soc_device *soc_dev;
> struct device_node *np;
> void __iomem *regs;
> - u32 cidr, exid;
>
> np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "atmel,at91rm9200-dbgu");
> if (!np)
> np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL,
> "atmel,at91sam9260-dbgu");
> + if (!np)
> + return -ENODEV;
>
> - if (!np) {
> - pr_warn("Could not find DBGU node");
> - return NULL;
> + regs = of_iomap(np, 0);
> + of_node_put(np);
> +
> + if (!regs) {
> + pr_warn("Could not map DBGU iomem range");
> + return -ENXIO;
> }
>
> + *cidr = readl(regs + AT91_DBGU_CIDR);
> + *exid = readl(regs + AT91_DBGU_EXID);
> +
> + iounmap(regs);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int __init at91_get_cidr_exid_from_chipid(u32 *cidr, u32 *exid)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np;
> + void __iomem *regs;
> +
> + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "atmel,sama5d2-chipid");
> + if (!np)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> regs = of_iomap(np, 0);
> of_node_put(np);
>
> if (!regs) {
> pr_warn("Could not map DBGU iomem range");
> - return NULL;
> + return -ENXIO;
> }
>
> - cidr = readl(regs + AT91_DBGU_CIDR);
> - exid = readl(regs + AT91_DBGU_EXID);
> + *cidr = readl(regs + AT91_CHIPID_CIDR);
> + *exid = readl(regs + AT91_CHIPID_EXID);
>
> iounmap(regs);
>
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +struct soc_device * __init at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc *socs)
> +{
> + struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
> + const struct at91_soc *soc;
> + struct soc_device *soc_dev;
> + u32 cidr, exid;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * With SAMA5D2 and later SoCs, CIDR and EXID registers are no more
> + * in the dbgu device but in the chipid device whose purpose is only
> + * to expose these two registers.
> + */
> + ret = at91_get_cidr_exid_from_dbgu(&cidr, &exid);
> + if (ret)
> + ret = at91_get_cidr_exid_from_chipid(&cidr, &exid);
> + if (ret) {
> + if (ret == -ENODEV)
> + pr_warn("Could not find identification node");
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> for (soc = socs; soc->name; soc++) {
> - if (soc->cidr_match != (cidr & AT91_DBGU_CIDR_MATCH_MASK))
> + if (soc->cidr_match != (cidr & AT91_CIDR_MATCH_MASK))
> continue;
>
> - if (!(cidr & AT91_DBGU_CIDR_EXT) || soc->exid_match == exid)
> + if (!(cidr & AT91_CIDR_EXT) || soc->exid_match == exid)
> break;
> }
>
> @@ -79,7 +124,7 @@ struct soc_device * __init at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc *socs)
> soc_dev_attr->family = soc->family;
> soc_dev_attr->soc_id = soc->name;
> soc_dev_attr->revision = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%X",
> - AT91_DBGU_CIDR_VERSION(cidr));
> + AT91_CIDR_VERSION(cidr));
> soc_dev = soc_device_register(soc_dev_attr);
> if (IS_ERR(soc_dev)) {
> kfree(soc_dev_attr->revision);
> @@ -91,7 +136,7 @@ struct soc_device * __init at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc *socs)
> if (soc->family)
> pr_info("Detected SoC family: %s\n", soc->family);
> pr_info("Detected SoC: %s, revision %X\n", soc->name,
> - AT91_DBGU_CIDR_VERSION(cidr));
> + AT91_CIDR_VERSION(cidr));
>
> return soc_dev;
> }
> --
> 2.5.0
>
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists