lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:49:18 -0700
From:	Sai Gurrappadi <sgurrappadi@...dia.com>
To:	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
	<vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	<mark.rutland@....com>, <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	<sudeep.holla@....com>, <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
	<catalin.marinas@....com>, <will.deacon@....com>,
	<morten.rasmussen@....com>, <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
	<broonie@...nel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
	<pboonstoppel@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] Documentation: arm: define DT cpu capacity bindings

Hi Juri,

On 03/18/2016 07:24 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:

<snip>

> +
> +==========================================
> +2 - CPU capacity definition
> +==========================================
> +
> +CPU capacity is a number that provides the scheduler information about CPUs
> +heterogeneity. Such heterogeneity can come from micro-architectural differences
> +(e.g., ARM big.LITTLE systems) or maximum frequency at which CPUs can run
> +(e.g., SMP systems with multiple frequency domains). Heterogeneity in this
> +context is about differing performance characteristics; this binding tries to
> +capture a first-order approximation of the relative performance of CPUs.

Any reason why this capacity number is not dynamically generated based on the
max frequency for each CPU? The DT property would then instead specify just
the micro-architectural differences between the CPU types.

-Sai

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ