[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160318174953.GK6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 18:49:53 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, jkosina@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] watchdog: Fix output
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:37:48PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> +++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
> * to those contributors as well.
> */
>
> -#define pr_fmt(fmt) "NMI watchdog: " fmt
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "Lockup detector: " fmt
>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> #include <linux/cpu.h>
> @@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ static void watchdog_overflow_callback(struct perf_event *event,
> if (__this_cpu_read(hard_watchdog_warn) == true)
> return;
>
> - pr_emerg("Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu %d", this_cpu);
> + pr_emerg("Detected hard LOCKUP on cpu %d", this_cpu);
> print_modules();
> print_irqtrace_events(current);
> if (regs)
It was Jiri who made this mess by replacing WARN(), which has a very
distinct format, with this custom stuff.
I think we should go back to the WARN() thing.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists