linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] watchdog: Fix output

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160318181206.GS64531@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:12:06 -0400
From:	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] watchdog: Fix output

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 05:48:58PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 05:44:41PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:37:48PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> > > Would something like this be a better patch?
> > 
> > > -#define pr_fmt(fmt) "NMI watchdog: " fmt
> > > +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "Lockup detector: " fmt
> 
> You might want to audit all the other pr_ nonsense in that file; a lot
> of the msgs don't particularly make sense when combined with the prefix.
> 
> Some are for the NMI thing, others for the soft lockup one.
> 
> I would just chuck pr_crap() altogether and use sensible text.

Hehe.  I'll look into that next week.  :-)

Cheers,
Don