linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fence: add missing descriptions for fence

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56EDE9B2.1080406@osg.samsung.com>
Date:	Sun, 20 Mar 2016 00:07:14 +0000
From:	Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@....samsung.com>
To:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>
CC:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	sumit.semwal@...aro.org,
	Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
	"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fence: add missing descriptions for fence

On 19/03/16 23:55, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Luis,
> 
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Luis de Bethencourt
> <luisbg@....samsung.com> wrote:
>> Commit b55b54b5db33 ("staging/android: remove struct sync_pt")
>> added the members child_list and active_list to the fence struct, but
>> didn't add descriptions for these. Adding the descriptions.
>>
> 
> Patches whose commit message mentions a specific commit that
> introduced and issue, usually also have a "Fixes:" tag before the
> S-o-B. For example this patch should have:
> 
> Fixes: b55b54b5db33 ("staging/android: remove struct sync_pt")
>> Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@....samsung.com>
>> ---
>> Hi,
>>
>> Noticed this missing descriptions when running make htmldocs.
>>
>> Got the following warnings:
>> .//include/linux/fence.h:84: warning: No description found for parameter 'child_list'
>> .//include/linux/fence.h:84: warning: No description found for parameter 'active_list'
>>
>> Thanks :)
>> Luis
>>
> 
> Patch looks good to me.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
> 
> Best regards,
> Javier
> 

Hi Javier,

I didn't knew that, but thanks for saying so I can learn and use it in the
future.

I used the 'Commit b55b54b5db33 ("staging/android: remove struct sync_pt")'
format because that is what checkpatch recommended. But after re-reading
Documentation/SubmittingPatches it all makes sense and the process is clear
in my head.

Thanks!
Luis