lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABYiri8XMThPtHgs4rNqjwcu5zzPrg88WJdGXfPSUdMTGpEfAw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 20 Mar 2016 21:42:15 +0300
From:	Andrey Korolyov <andrey@...l.ru>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:	Marc Haber <mh+linux-kernel@...schlus.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kvm ML <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Major KVM issues with kernel 4.5 on the host

On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 9:25 PM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 08:14:58PM +0300, Andrey Korolyov wrote:
>> Kinda naive question - do you run same ucode version as Marc on his device?
>
> Yeah, we both have 0x010000dc.
>
> In case you're referring to the recent faulty AMD microcode patch -
> it doesn't apply here. The boxes in question are family 0x10 and the
> microcode patch is for family 0x15.
>

Yes, I suggested that the issue could fall over a different family as
well to expose explicit corruption of a guest pages (as opposed to a
generic corruption in a known case). Since there is no direct evidence
of what exactly (data or pgt) is getting corrupted, would disabling
npt for a testing purposes be helpful?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ