lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160320185813.GG4230@pd.tnic>
Date:	Sun, 20 Mar 2016 19:58:13 +0100
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Andrey Korolyov <andrey@...l.ru>
Cc:	Marc Haber <mh+linux-kernel@...schlus.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kvm ML <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Major KVM issues with kernel 4.5 on the host

On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 09:42:15PM +0300, Andrey Korolyov wrote:
> Yes, I suggested that the issue could fall over a different family as
> well to expose explicit corruption of a guest pages (as opposed to a
> generic corruption in a known case).

Probably, but I don't think it is microcode patch related.

> Since there is no direct evidence of what exactly (data or pgt) is
> getting corrupted, would disabling npt for a testing purposes be
> helpful?

So I'm not sure what even happens here yet. I haven't seen anything out
of the ordinary in Marc's dmesg and I wasn't able to reproduce either.
So would it be good to try with "npt=0"? Sure, why not.

Marc, you could give that a try to see if it changes anything...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ