[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1603201301330.3978@nanos>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 13:04:05 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
cc: peterz@...radead.org, ak@...ux.intel.com, eranian@...gle.com,
mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] x86/perf/intel/uncore: Make Intel rapl modular
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016, kan.liang@...el.com wrote:
>
> +static struct notifier_block rapl_cpu_nb = {
> + .notifier_call = rapl_cpu_notifier,
Hmm. Missed that in the first round. That lacks
.priority = CPU_PRI_PERF + 1,
because the driver needs to migrate its stuff away before the core code gets
notified about the cpu going down.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists