linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][v5] ACPI / PM: Introduce efi poweroff for HW-full platforms without

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160321140512.GA11676@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Date:	Mon, 21 Mar 2016 14:05:12 +0000
From:	Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:	Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	x86@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][v5] ACPI / PM: Introduce efi poweroff for HW-full
 platforms without _S5

On Mon, 21 Mar, at 01:43:18PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> OK, this is fine by me.
> 
> Matt, what do you think?

If possible I'd like to see some mention in the commit message of
future Intel Base-IA platforms requiring this support, so when someone
asks me in the future (and I've forgotten the answer) "Why was this
patch get merged?" I can point to the commit log.

But other than that, yeah, this looks good to me. Thanks!

Reviewed-by: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>