[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160321154201.GA6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 16:42:01 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] nmi_backtrace: generate one-line reports for idle
cpus
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 01:02:13PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> index 9f7c21c22477..d569ae7fde37 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ void arch_cpu_idle(void)
> /*
> * We use this if we don't have any better idle routine..
> */
> -void default_idle(void)
> +void __cpuidle default_idle(void)
> {
> trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(1, smp_processor_id());
> safe_halt();
> @@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ static int prefer_mwait_c1_over_halt(const struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> * with interrupts enabled and no flags, which is backwards compatible with the
> * original MWAIT implementation.
> */
> -static void mwait_idle(void)
> +static __cpuidle void mwait_idle(void)
> {
> if (!current_set_polling_and_test()) {
> trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(1, smp_processor_id());
The most common idle function for x86 is: mwait_idle_with_hints(),
trouble is, its an inline, so I'm not sure adding __cpuidle to it does
anything.
I've yet to find the magic objdump incantation to check. Or rather
objdump -h doesn't appear to list .cpuidle.text at all :/
I'm probably doing something silly...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists