linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] fs, mm: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1603211121210.26353@east.gentwo.org>
Date:	Mon, 21 Mar 2016 11:25:09 -0500 (CDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] fs, mm: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release}
 macros

On Mon, 21 Mar 2016, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:

> PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago
> with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with
> bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
>
> This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.

So we decided that we are never going to put THP pages on a LRU? Will this
actually work if we have really huge memory (100s of TB) where almost
everything is a huge page? Guess we have to use hugetlbfs and we need to
think about this as being exempt from paging.