linux-kernel - Re: UFS V11 patch-set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160322154358.GD2566@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 22 Mar 2016 15:43:58 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
Cc:	vinayak holikatti <vinholikatti@...il.com>,
	JBottomley@...allels.com, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, hch@....de,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Carlos Palminha <CARLOS.PALMINHA@...opsys.com>,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	"robh@...nel.org >> Rob Herring" <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: UFS V11 patch-set

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 03:31:25PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:04:25AM +0000, Joao Pinto wrote:

> > I have no intend to break the rules. I am just trying to communicate with UFS
> > maintainers that so far gave me no response. Merging in v4.7 is fine, but I
> > would like that UFS maintainers give me some feedback about the next steps, but
> > so far didn't have luck.

> Like I say the next steps are those Arnd gave you: repost after -rc1.
> Then give people at least a week or so to respond, people do get busy
> and other people are also sending patches.

I'd also suggest checking James Bottomley's e-mail address, the one
you're using here bounces and isn't the one advertised in MAINTAINERS
(you should check that for other maintainers too).

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)