linux-kernel - Re: UFS V11 patch-set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56F16A6C.7080806@synopsys.com>
Date:	Tue, 22 Mar 2016 15:53:16 +0000
From:	Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
CC:	vinayak holikatti <vinholikatti@...il.com>,
	<rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>, <hch@....de>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Carlos Palminha <CARLOS.PALMINHA@...opsys.com>,
	<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"robh@...nel.org >> Rob Herring" <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: UFS V11 patch-set

On 3/22/2016 3:43 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 03:31:25PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:04:25AM +0000, Joao Pinto wrote:
> 
>>> I have no intend to break the rules. I am just trying to communicate with UFS
>>> maintainers that so far gave me no response. Merging in v4.7 is fine, but I
>>> would like that UFS maintainers give me some feedback about the next steps, but
>>> so far didn't have luck.
> 
>> Like I say the next steps are those Arnd gave you: repost after -rc1.
>> Then give people at least a week or so to respond, people do get busy
>> and other people are also sending patches.
> 
> I'd also suggest checking James Bottomley's e-mail address, the one
> you're using here bounces and isn't the one advertised in MAINTAINERS
> (you should check that for other maintainers too).
> 

I took James's email from commit logs in UFS. Thanks for the info.

Joao