[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160322025112.GQ27778@vireshk-i7>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 08:21:12 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: governor: Always schedule work on the CPU
running update
On 22-03-16, 01:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> Modify dbs_irq_work() to always schedule the process-context work
> on the current CPU which also ran the dbs_update_util_handler()
> that the irq_work being handled came from.
>
> This causes the entire frequency update handling (involving the
> "ondemand" or "conservative" governors) to be carried out by the
> CPU whose frequency is to be updated and reduces the overall amount
> of inter-CPU noise related to cpufreq.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static void dbs_irq_work(struct irq_work
> struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs;
>
> policy_dbs = container_of(irq_work, struct policy_dbs_info, irq_work);
> - schedule_work(&policy_dbs->work);
> + schedule_work_on(smp_processor_id(), &policy_dbs->work);
> }
>
> static void dbs_update_util_handler(struct update_util_data *data, u64 time,
queue_work() used to queue the work on local cpu by default, has that
changed now ?
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists