linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: at91: use chipid device for soc detection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56F27C89.9070004@atmel.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Mar 2016 12:22:49 +0100
From:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To:	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	"Ludovic Desroches" <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
CC:	<plagnioj@...osoft.com>, <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: at91: use chipid device for soc detection

Le 18/03/2016 11:34, Alexandre Belloni a écrit :
> On 18/03/2016 at 08:21:19 +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote :
>> So far, the CIDR and EXID registers were in the DBGU interface. This device
>> has disappeared with the SAMA5D2 family. These registers are exposed
>> through a new device called chipid.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
>> [nicolas.ferre@...el.com: remove useless warnings]
> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
> 
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt         |  4 ++
>>  arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c                           | 81 +++++++++++++++++-----

We may need to split this patch in 2 for going through separate arm-soc
branches: what do you think Alexandre?

Anyway, I can do it myself: no need to re-send a version:
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>

We'll queue it in our upcoming at91-4.7-dt and at91-4.7-soc branches.

Bye,



>>  2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt
>> index 7fd64ec..0b1fcbf 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt
>> @@ -41,6 +41,10 @@ compatible: must be one of:
>>         - "atmel,sama5d43"
>>         - "atmel,sama5d44"
>>  
>> +Chipid required properties:
>> +- compatible: Should be "atmel,sama5d2-chipid"
>> +- reg : Should contain registers location and length
>> +
>>  PIT Timer required properties:
>>  - compatible: Should be "atmel,at91sam9260-pit"
>>  - reg: Should contain registers location and length
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c
>> index 54343ff..034d563 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c
>> @@ -22,48 +22,93 @@
>>  #include "soc.h"
>>  
>>  #define AT91_DBGU_CIDR			0x40
>> -#define AT91_DBGU_CIDR_VERSION(x)	((x) & 0x1f)
>> -#define AT91_DBGU_CIDR_EXT		BIT(31)
>> -#define AT91_DBGU_CIDR_MATCH_MASK	0x7fffffe0
>>  #define AT91_DBGU_EXID			0x44
>> +#define AT91_CHIPID_CIDR		0x00
>> +#define AT91_CHIPID_EXID		0x04
>> +#define AT91_CIDR_VERSION(x)		((x) & 0x1f)
>> +#define AT91_CIDR_EXT			BIT(31)
>> +#define AT91_CIDR_MATCH_MASK		0x7fffffe0
>>  
>> -struct soc_device * __init at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc *socs)
>> +int __init at91_get_cidr_exid_from_dbgu(u32 *cidr, u32 *exid)
>>  {
>> -	struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
>> -	const struct at91_soc *soc;
>> -	struct soc_device *soc_dev;
>>  	struct device_node *np;
>>  	void __iomem *regs;
>> -	u32 cidr, exid;
>>  
>>  	np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "atmel,at91rm9200-dbgu");
>>  	if (!np)
>>  		np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL,
>>  					     "atmel,at91sam9260-dbgu");
>> +	if (!np)
>> +		return -ENODEV;
>>  
>> -	if (!np) {
>> -		pr_warn("Could not find DBGU node");
>> -		return NULL;
>> +	regs = of_iomap(np, 0);
>> +	of_node_put(np);
>> +
>> +	if (!regs) {
>> +		pr_warn("Could not map DBGU iomem range");
>> +		return -ENXIO;
>>  	}
>>  
>> +	*cidr = readl(regs + AT91_DBGU_CIDR);
>> +	*exid = readl(regs + AT91_DBGU_EXID);
>> +
>> +	iounmap(regs);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int __init at91_get_cidr_exid_from_chipid(u32 *cidr, u32 *exid)
>> +{
>> +	struct device_node *np;
>> +	void __iomem *regs;
>> +
>> +	np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "atmel,sama5d2-chipid");
>> +	if (!np)
>> +		return -ENODEV;
>> +
>>  	regs = of_iomap(np, 0);
>>  	of_node_put(np);
>>  
>>  	if (!regs) {
>>  		pr_warn("Could not map DBGU iomem range");
>> -		return NULL;
>> +		return -ENXIO;
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	cidr = readl(regs + AT91_DBGU_CIDR);
>> -	exid = readl(regs + AT91_DBGU_EXID);
>> +	*cidr = readl(regs + AT91_CHIPID_CIDR);
>> +	*exid = readl(regs + AT91_CHIPID_EXID);
>>  
>>  	iounmap(regs);
>>  
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +struct soc_device * __init at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc *socs)
>> +{
>> +	struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
>> +	const struct at91_soc *soc;
>> +	struct soc_device *soc_dev;
>> +	u32 cidr, exid;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * With SAMA5D2 and later SoCs, CIDR and EXID registers are no more
>> +	 * in the dbgu device but in the chipid device whose purpose is only
>> +	 * to expose these two registers.
>> +	 */
>> +	ret = at91_get_cidr_exid_from_dbgu(&cidr, &exid);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		ret = at91_get_cidr_exid_from_chipid(&cidr, &exid);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		if (ret == -ENODEV)
>> +			pr_warn("Could not find identification node");
>> +		return NULL;
>> +	}
>> +
>>  	for (soc = socs; soc->name; soc++) {
>> -		if (soc->cidr_match != (cidr & AT91_DBGU_CIDR_MATCH_MASK))
>> +		if (soc->cidr_match != (cidr & AT91_CIDR_MATCH_MASK))
>>  			continue;
>>  
>> -		if (!(cidr & AT91_DBGU_CIDR_EXT) || soc->exid_match == exid)
>> +		if (!(cidr & AT91_CIDR_EXT) || soc->exid_match == exid)
>>  			break;
>>  	}
>>  
>> @@ -79,7 +124,7 @@ struct soc_device * __init at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc *socs)
>>  	soc_dev_attr->family = soc->family;
>>  	soc_dev_attr->soc_id = soc->name;
>>  	soc_dev_attr->revision = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%X",
>> -					   AT91_DBGU_CIDR_VERSION(cidr));
>> +					   AT91_CIDR_VERSION(cidr));
>>  	soc_dev = soc_device_register(soc_dev_attr);
>>  	if (IS_ERR(soc_dev)) {
>>  		kfree(soc_dev_attr->revision);
>> @@ -91,7 +136,7 @@ struct soc_device * __init at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc *socs)
>>  	if (soc->family)
>>  		pr_info("Detected SoC family: %s\n", soc->family);
>>  	pr_info("Detected SoC: %s, revision %X\n", soc->name,
>> -		AT91_DBGU_CIDR_VERSION(cidr));
>> +		AT91_CIDR_VERSION(cidr));
>>  
>>  	return soc_dev;
>>  }
>> -- 
>> 2.5.0
>>
> 


-- 
Nicolas Ferre