| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 14:47:50 +0100 From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com> To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com> Cc: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>, plagnioj@...osoft.com, boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: at91: use chipid device for soc detection On 23/03/2016 at 12:22:49 +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote : > Le 18/03/2016 11:34, Alexandre Belloni a écrit : > > On 18/03/2016 at 08:21:19 +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote : > >> So far, the CIDR and EXID registers were in the DBGU interface. This device > >> has disappeared with the SAMA5D2 family. These registers are exposed > >> through a new device called chipid. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com> > >> [nicolas.ferre@...el.com: remove useless warnings] > > Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com> > > > >> --- > >> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt | 4 ++ > >> arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++----- > > We may need to split this patch in 2 for going through separate arm-soc > branches: what do you think Alexandre? > I think the patch can go in as it is now, the documentation being in line with the code. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists