[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56FA88DF.20208@atmel.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 15:53:35 +0200
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
CC: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
<plagnioj@...osoft.com>, <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: at91: use chipid device for soc detection
Le 23/03/2016 14:47, Alexandre Belloni a écrit :
> On 23/03/2016 at 12:22:49 +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote :
>> Le 18/03/2016 11:34, Alexandre Belloni a écrit :
>>> On 18/03/2016 at 08:21:19 +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote :
>>>> So far, the CIDR and EXID registers were in the DBGU interface. This device
>>>> has disappeared with the SAMA5D2 family. These registers are exposed
>>>> through a new device called chipid.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
>>>> [nicolas.ferre@...el.com: remove useless warnings]
>>> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt | 4 ++
>>>> arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++-----
>>
>> We may need to split this patch in 2 for going through separate arm-soc
>> branches: what do you think Alexandre?
>>
>
> I think the patch can go in as it is now, the documentation being in
> line with the code.
Okay: patches 1 & 2 in the "soc" branch.
patch 3 in the "dt" branch.
Bye,
--
Nicolas Ferre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists