linux-kernel - Applied "regulator: act8865: Remove redundant dev lookups" to the regulator tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 23 Mar 2016 13:43:05 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Maarten ter Huurne <maarten@...ewalker.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Applied "regulator: act8865: Remove redundant dev lookups" to the regulator tree

The patch

   regulator: act8865: Remove redundant dev lookups

has been applied to the regulator tree at

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From de14ba67378df74c6328f75fd6972ef83ed4639b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maarten ter Huurne <maarten@...ewalker.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 15:05:05 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: act8865: Remove redundant dev lookups

The local variable "dev" already contains a pointer to the device,
so there is no need to take the address of "client->dev" again.

Signed-off-by: Maarten ter Huurne <maarten@...ewalker.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c
index 000d566e32a4..89f856f257f7 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c
@@ -498,8 +498,7 @@ static int act8865_pmic_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
 	act8865->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &act8865_regmap_config);
 	if (IS_ERR(act8865->regmap)) {
 		ret = PTR_ERR(act8865->regmap);
-		dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to allocate register map: %d\n",
-			ret);
+		dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate register map: %d\n", ret);
 		return ret;
 	}

@@ -526,7 +525,7 @@ static int act8865_pmic_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
 		config.driver_data = act8865;
 		config.regmap = act8865->regmap;

-		rdev = devm_regulator_register(&client->dev, desc, &config);
+		rdev = devm_regulator_register(dev, desc, &config);
 		if (IS_ERR(rdev)) {
 			dev_err(dev, "failed to register %s\n", desc->name);
 			return PTR_ERR(rdev);
-- 
2.7.0