lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56F3199C.3060502@suse.de>
Date:	Wed, 23 Mar 2016 23:33:00 +0100
From:	Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
To:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH] [media] exynos4-is: Fix fimc_is_parse_sensor_config()
 nodes handling

Hi Javier,

Am 23.03.2016 um 17:15 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
> The same struct device_node * is used for looking up the I2C sensor, OF
> graph endpoint and port. So the reference count is incremented but not
> decremented for the endpoint and port nodes.
> 
> Fix this by having separate pointers for each node looked up.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-is.c b/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-is.c
> index 979c388ebf60..0b04a5d25187 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-is.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-is.c
> @@ -165,6 +165,7 @@ static int fimc_is_parse_sensor_config(struct fimc_is *is, unsigned int index,
>  						struct device_node *node)
>  {
>  	struct fimc_is_sensor *sensor = &is->sensor[index];
> +	struct device_node *ep, *port;
>  	u32 tmp = 0;
>  	int ret;
>  
> @@ -175,16 +176,18 @@ static int fimc_is_parse_sensor_config(struct fimc_is *is, unsigned int index,
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	node = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(node, NULL);
> -	if (!node)
> +	ep = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(node, NULL);
> +	if (!ep)
>  		return -ENXIO;
>  
> -	node = of_graph_get_remote_port(node);
> -	if (!node)
> +	port = of_graph_get_remote_port(ep);
> +	of_node_put(ep);
> +	if (!port)
>  		return -ENXIO;
>  
>  	/* Use MIPI-CSIS channel id to determine the ISP I2C bus index. */
> -	ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "reg", &tmp);
> +	ret = of_property_read_u32(port, "reg", &tmp);
> +	of_node_put(port);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		dev_err(&is->pdev->dev, "reg property not found at: %s\n",
>  							 node->full_name);

port->full_name. You'll need to defer the of_node_put(port) then.

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ