[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56F319BC.5050405@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 15:33:32 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Matthew McClintock <mmcclint@...eaurora.org>,
andy.gross@...aro.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: qca-upstream.external@....qualcomm.com,
David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT" <linux-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM PORT" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/17] qcom: ipq4019: add cpu operating points for cpufreq
support
On 03/23/2016 03:05 PM, Matthew McClintock wrote:
> This adds some operating points for cpu frequeny scaling
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew McClintock <mmcclint@...eaurora.org>
> ---
Can you use the v2 OPP bindings instead? I imagine uV could be left out
then because there isn't any regulator control?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists