[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2448247.bv1n5rEkZ3@c203>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 16:15:28 +0100
From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: "linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/13] libnvdimm, blk: use devm_add_action to release bdev resources
On Donnerstag, 24. März 2016 08:14:10 CET Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 4:48 AM, Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
wrote:
> > On Mittwoch, 23. März 2016 18:25:47 CET Dan Williams wrote:
> >> Register a callback to clean up the request_queue and put the gendisk at
> >> driver disable time.
> >>
> >> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> static int nd_blk_remove(struct device *dev)
> >> {
> >>
> >> - struct nd_blk_device *blk_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> >> -
> >>
> >> if (is_nd_btt(dev))
> >>
> >> nvdimm_namespace_detach_btt(to_nd_btt(dev));
> >>
> >> - else
> >> - nd_blk_detach_disk(blk_dev);
> >> - kfree(blk_dev);
> >> -
> >>
> >> return 0;
> >>
> >> }
> >
> > Can't this be void?
>
> That's not how the core defines this:
>
> struct device_driver {
> ...
> int (*remove) (struct device *dev);
> ...
> };
Ah OK, didn't see this, sorry
--
Johannes Thumshirn Storage
jthumshirn@...e.de +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850
Powered by blists - more mailing lists