lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4jVtFtvPZkW3N8uevOfRPvs6nL=F8TWgw2tE15Xhf3RyA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:21:20 -0700
From:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:	Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
Cc:	"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/13] libnvdimm, blk: move i/o infrastructure to nd_namespace_blk

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 5:22 AM, Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de> wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 23. März 2016 18:26:03 CET Dan Williams wrote:
>> Consolidate the information for issuing i/o to a blk-namespace, and
>> eliminate some pointer chasing.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
>> ---
> [...]
>>               BUG_ON(len > PAGE_SIZE);
>> -             err = nd_blk_do_bvec(blk_dev, bip, bvec.bv_page, len,
>> -                                     bvec.bv_offset, rw, iter.bi_sector);
>> +             err = nsblk_do_bvec(nsblk, bip, bvec.bv_page, len,
>> +                             bvec.bv_offset, rw, iter.bi_sector);
>>               if (err) {
>> -                     dev_info(&blk_dev->nsblk->common.dev,
>> +                     dev_dbg(&nsblk->common.dev,
>>                                       "io error in %s sector %lld, len %d,\n",
>>                                       (rw == READ) ? "READ" : "WRITE",
>>                                       (unsigned long long) iter.bi_sector, len);
>
> Why is an I/O error suddently a debug message instead of an error?

True, that's a jarring change not described in the log, should
probably be its own patch.  The rationale is that upper layers already
have error prints for failed commands and this one is redundant.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ