linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] drivers/mtd: make several functions return bool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160325092441.GA5738@yaowei-K42JY>
Date:	Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:24:41 +0800
From:	Yaowei Bai <baiyaowei@...s.chinamobile.com>
To:	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
	Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@...ystack.cn>,
	dwmw2@...radead.org, computersforpeace@...il.com,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] drivers/mtd: make several functions return bool

On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 09:58:21AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 08:57:59 +0100
> Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:
> 
> > Am 25.03.2016 um 07:31 schrieb Yaowei Bai:
> > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:54:51AM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> > >> ccing: Brian and Richard
> > >>
> > >> Hi Yao,
> > >>     Is that really necessary? I am not sure how much benefit we can
> > >> achieve from this change.
> > >> Could you explain more?
> > > 
> > > Yes, according to these functions' name, a boolean return value is more
> > > suitable and matchable.
> > > 
> > > Also personally think this change maybe benfit function's return value 
> > > storage in the stack when called on certain architectures.
> > 
> > On which archs? And what exactly is the benefit?
> > I agree that bool might be a better choice for new functions
> > but here you're touching existing and working(!) code.
> > The only outcome is git history pollution that makes git blame
> > less efficient.
> 
> Indeed, you raised a good point. Having useless changes pollute git
> blame output may be problematic. Not sure I want to apply those patches
> anymore :-/.
> 
> Anyway, Yao, I'm sure you can find other usefull things to contribute.

OK, thanks for reviewing.

> 
> -- 
> Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> http://free-electrons.com