linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "regulator: core: Add support for active-discharge configuration"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160325145847.GE2566@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Fri, 25 Mar 2016 14:58:47 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com>
Cc:	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "regulator: core: Add support for
 active-discharge configuration"

On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 02:31:47PM +0200, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:

> I agree, but the subsystem name is found in the name of the reverted commit.

That doesn't help if it's not at the start of the subject line of the
e-mail.

> Do you ask me to resumbit the change changing the subject to
> 'regulator: core: Revert "regulator: core: Add support for active-discharg
>  configuration"'?

Well, I applied it already so no but in future yes, reverts are patches
like any other and should follow exactly the same process.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)