linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "regulator: core: Add support for active-discharge configuration"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 25 Mar 2016 15:45:07 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com>
Cc:	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "regulator: core: Add support for
 active-discharge configuration"

On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 04:52:32PM +0200, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> On 25.03.2016 13:10, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the
> > subsystem.  This makes it easier for people to identify relevant
> > patches.

> Okay, submitting of reverted patches is different I believe:

> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg75667.html

Nope, they're patches like other patches.  A big part of what the
subject line does is help people work out what they need to look at,
something that doesn't pattern match doesn't fulfil that need.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)