[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87fuvfw6g9.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 15:02:30 +1100
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
To: Sage Weil <sweil@...hat.com>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Ceph fixes for -rc7
On Sun, Mar 06 2016, Sage Weil wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> Please pull the following Ceph patch from
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sage/ceph-client.git for-linus
>
> This is a final commit we missed to align the protocol compatibility with
> the feature bits. It decodes a few extra fields in two different messages
> and reports EIO when they are used (not yet supported).
>
> Thanks!
> sage
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Yan, Zheng (1):
> ceph: initial CEPH_FEATURE_FS_FILE_LAYOUT_V2 support
Just wondering, but was CEPH_FEATURE_FS_FILE_LAYOUT_V2 supposed to have
exactly the same value as CEPH_FEATURE_NEW_OSDOPREPLY_ENCODING (and
CEPH_FEATURE_CRUSH_TUNABLES5)??
Because when I backported this patch (and many others) to some ancient
enterprise kernel, it caused mounts to fail. If it really is meant to
be the same value, then I must have some other backported issue to find
and fix.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
>
> fs/ceph/addr.c | 4 ++++
> fs/ceph/caps.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> fs/ceph/inode.c | 2 ++
> fs/ceph/mds_client.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> fs/ceph/mds_client.h | 1 +
> fs/ceph/super.h | 1 +
> include/linux/ceph/ceph_features.h | 1 +
> 7 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (819 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists