linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] f2fs updates for v4.6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 26 Mar 2016 13:04:44 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc:	Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux FS Dev Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux F2FS Dev Mailing List 
	<linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@...gle.com>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] f2fs updates for v4.6

On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> After then, as Dave suggested, we needed to move the crypto libraries into
> common fs/crypto, so that other filesystems can support that in common sense.
>
> Please check the below threads about this history.
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fsdevel/msg93424.html

That's not the explanation we wanted.

The thing that needs explaining is the "index" change to
"inode->i_ino", which I undid.

How/why did that happen?

                 Linus