[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56F8ECDE.3010701@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 09:35:42 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: "zhaoxiu.zeng" <zhaoxiu.zeng@...il.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 28/31] iio: gyro: use parity32 in adxrs450.c
On 27/03/16 08:42, zhaoxiu.zeng wrote:
> From: Zeng Zhaoxiu <zhaoxiu.zeng@...il.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Zeng Zhaoxiu <zhaoxiu.zeng@...il.com>
Interesting. Whilst obviously correct I wonder if this obscures the
intent of the code a little. Lars, what do you think?
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/gyro/adxrs450.c | 8 ++------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/gyro/adxrs450.c b/drivers/iio/gyro/adxrs450.c
> index a330d42..f1f19fc20 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/gyro/adxrs450.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/gyro/adxrs450.c
> @@ -108,9 +108,7 @@ static int adxrs450_spi_read_reg_16(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>
> mutex_lock(&st->buf_lock);
> tx = ADXRS450_READ_DATA | (reg_address << 17);
> -
> - if (!(hweight32(tx) & 1))
> - tx |= ADXRS450_P;
> + tx |= !parity32(tx) * ADXRS450_P;
>
> st->tx = cpu_to_be32(tx);
> ret = spi_sync_transfer(st->us, xfers, ARRAY_SIZE(xfers));
> @@ -144,9 +142,7 @@ static int adxrs450_spi_write_reg_16(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>
> mutex_lock(&st->buf_lock);
> tx = ADXRS450_WRITE_DATA | (reg_address << 17) | (val << 1);
> -
> - if (!(hweight32(tx) & 1))
> - tx |= ADXRS450_P;
> + tx |= !parity32(tx) * ADXRS450_P;
>
> st->tx = cpu_to_be32(tx);
> ret = spi_write(st->us, &st->tx, sizeof(st->tx));
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists