[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1459230998.25110.73.camel@perches.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 22:56:38 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: "Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>
Cc: Lv Zheng <zetalog@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/30] ACPICA: Linuxize: reduce divergences for 20160212
release
On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 05:37 +0000, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> Hi,
Hi again.
> > No, I disagree. _I_ don't need to. You need to.
> [Lv Zheng]
> Then you don't have to provide the solution as you are not the one executing the process.
> I can fix it myself:
> https://github.com/acpica/acpica/pull/129
> It would be merged by the ACPICA upstream in the near future.
Excellent, thank you.
For this: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/pull/129/commits/b2294cae776f5a66a7697414b21949d307e6856f
Maybe you could use \w+ instead of [_a-zA-Z0-9]+
> I'll show you the difficulties of "process" later.
ok, appreciate your time.
> > You shouldn't have a process that generates defective patches
> > and then sends them to the list.
> [Lv Zheng]
> You are not the one executing this process, so you don't know what's happening here.
True.
> Actually the Linux repo should be synced to the state of the ACPICA repo.
That's more doubtful, but then again I don't maintain
ACPICA and you do.
cheers, Joe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists