| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-id: <56FA192A.9030209@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:56:58 +0900
From: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>
To: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...nel-upstream.org>,
Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@...aro.org>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org,
Paweł Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
Xinwei Kong <kong.kongxinwei@...ilicon.com>,
Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: dw_mmc: add resets support to dw_mmc
On 03/29/2016 11:22 AM, Shawn Lin wrote:
> 在 2016/3/25 13:35, Guodong Xu 写道:
>> Hi, Shawn
>>
>> Sorry I replied late. I added comments below.
>>
>> On 6 March 2016 at 22:16, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com
>> <mailto:shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>> wrote:
>>
>> On 2016/3/6 16:47, Guodong Xu wrote:
>>
>> mmc registers may in abnormal state if mmc is used in bootloader,
>> eg. to support booting from eMMC. So we need reset mmc registers
>> when kernel boots up, instead of assuming mmc is in clean state.
>>
>> With this patch, user can add a 'resets' property into dw_mmc dts
>> node. When driver parse_dt and probe, it calls reset API to
>> deassert the 'reset' of dw_mmc host controller. When probe error or
>> remove, it calls reset API to assert it.
>>
>> Please also refer to
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/reset.txt
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@...aro.org
>> <mailto:guodong.xu@...aro.org>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xinwei Kong <kong.kongxinwei@...ilicon.com
>> <mailto:kong.kongxinwei@...ilicon.com>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org
>> <mailto:zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>>
>>
>>
>> Really should V2 and add the changelog.
>>
>>
>> Yes, will do. next version I sent will be labelled as V3.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> index 242f9a0..281ea9c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> @@ -2878,6 +2878,14 @@ static struct dw_mci_board
>> *dw_mci_parse_dt(struct dw_mci *host)
>> if (!pdata)
>> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>
>> + /* find reset controller when exist */
>> + pdata->rstc = devm_reset_control_get_optional(dev, NULL);
>> + if (IS_ERR(pdata->rstc)) {
>> + if (PTR_ERR(pdata->rstc) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> + return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
>> + pdata->rstc = NULL;
>>
>>
>> maybe we can remove "pdata->rstc = NULL", and directly
>> use IS_ERR(..) for the following "if (host->pdata->rstc != NULL)"
>> statement
>>
>>
>> Yes, will do.
>> I see your point, other lines in this file are using IS_ERR(!..), I will
>> use this style too.
>>
>> + }
>> +
>> /* find out number of slots supported */
>> of_property_read_u32(np, "num-slots", &pdata->num_slots);
>>
>> @@ -2949,7 +2957,9 @@ int dw_mci_probe(struct dw_mci *host)
>>
>> if (!host->pdata) {
>> host->pdata = dw_mci_parse_dt(host);
>> - if (IS_ERR(host->pdata)) {
>> + if (PTR_ERR(host->pdata) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>>
>>
>> please fix the coding style here.
>>
>>
>> Do you mean to add additional {} for this 'if' , like this?
>>
>> + if (PTR_ERR(host->pdata) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
>> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>>
>> + }
>>
>> I will add {}.
>>
>>
>>
>> + else if (IS_ERR(host->pdata)) {
>> dev_err(host->dev, "platform data not
>> available\n");
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> @@ -3012,6 +3022,9 @@ int dw_mci_probe(struct dw_mci *host)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> + if (host->pdata->rstc != NULL)
>> + reset_control_deassert(host->pdata->rstc);
>> +
>>
>>
>> sorry, I can't follow your intention here. Shouldn't it be something
>> like "assert mmc -> may need delay -> deassert mmc". As your current
>> code, nothing happend right?
>>
>>
>> The chip exits from bootloader with this bit asserted. And when entering
>> kernel, we only need to deassert.
>>
>> In my current code, the driver deassert mmc in _probe(), and assert mmc
>> in _remove().
>
> I catch your point. From the previous discussion, we add it to make sure
> dw_mmc in good state after leaving bootloader to kernel. But My real question is that you can assert it in bootloader, so you can also
> dessert it in bootloaer to make sure dw_mmc work fine when probing
> in kernel. In that way, we don't need this patch?
Doesn't dw_mci_hw_reset work fine? I think that card should be reset with MMC_CAP_HW_RESET.
Could you check this?
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
>
> More to think, Is it ok to match the behaviour of bootloader stage?
> My bootloader doesn't assert the reset pin of dw_mmc, so it seams if
> I want to fix you issue on kernel stage, I need a new round of
> assert->delay->deassert.
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> setup_timer(&host->cmd11_timer,
>> dw_mci_cmd11_timer, (unsigned long)host);
>>
>> @@ -3164,6 +3177,9 @@ err_dmaunmap:
>> if (host->use_dma && host->dma_ops->exit)
>> host->dma_ops->exit(host);
>>
>> + if (host->pdata->rstc != NULL)
>> + reset_control_assert(host->pdata->rstc);
>> +
>> err_clk_ciu:
>> if (!IS_ERR(host->ciu_clk))
>> clk_disable_unprepare(host->ciu_clk);
>> @@ -3196,11 +3212,15 @@ void dw_mci_remove(struct dw_mci *host)
>> if (host->use_dma && host->dma_ops->exit)
>> host->dma_ops->exit(host);
>>
>> + if (host->pdata->rstc != NULL)
>> + reset_control_assert(host->pdata->rstc);
>> +
>> if (!IS_ERR(host->ciu_clk))
>> clk_disable_unprepare(host->ciu_clk);
>>
>> if (!IS_ERR(host->biu_clk))
>> clk_disable_unprepare(host->biu_clk);
>> +
>> }
>>
>>
>> unnecessary new line here.
>>
>>
>> Will fix.
>>
>> -Guodong
>>
>>
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(dw_mci_remove);
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards
>> Shawn Lin
>>
>>
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists