[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <201603291505.HKmOMR4P%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 15:59:00 +0800
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@...org, arm@...nel.org,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: uniphier: initialize outer cache for secondary
CPUs
Hi Masahiro,
[auto build test WARNING on arm-soc/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on v4.6-rc1 next-20160329]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improving the system]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Masahiro-Yamada/ARM-uniphier-fix-up-cache-ops-broadcast-of-ACTLR/20160329-094052
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc.git for-next
config: arm-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
reproduce:
wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make.cross ARCH=arm
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x557b4): Section mismatch in reference from the function uniphier_cache_secondary_init() to the function .init.text:uniphier_cache_activate_all_ways()
The function uniphier_cache_secondary_init() references
the function __init uniphier_cache_activate_all_ways().
This is often because uniphier_cache_secondary_init lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of uniphier_cache_activate_all_ways is wrong.
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
Download attachment ".config.gz" of type "application/octet-stream" (56597 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists