linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: uniphier: initialize outer cache for secondary CPUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:11:33 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc:	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>, kbuild-all@...org,
	arm@...nel.org, Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: uniphier: initialize outer cache for secondary CPUs

On Tuesday 29 March 2016 15:59:00 kbuild test robot wrote:
> 
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
> >> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x557b4): Section mismatch in reference from the function uniphier_cache_secondary_init() to the function .init.text:uniphier_cache_activate_all_ways()
>    The function uniphier_cache_secondary_init() references
>    the function __init uniphier_cache_activate_all_ways().
>    This is often because uniphier_cache_secondary_init lacks a __init
>    annotation or the annotation of uniphier_cache_activate_all_ways is wrong.
> 


I guess the former: uniphier_cache_secondary_init should be __init, as it will
only be run at boot time.

Please resend both patches.

	Arnd