[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160329120609.GG3408@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:06:09 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: kan.liang@...el.com
Cc: ak@...ux.intel.com, eranian@...gle.com, vincent.weaver@...ne.edu,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org, acme@...hat.com,
jolsa@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
ying.huang@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/1] perf/core: don't find side-band event from all
pmus
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:24:37AM -0700, kan.liang@...el.com wrote:
> The V2 patch is mainly based on Peter's suggestion. But I didn't rename
> perf_event_aux to perf_event_sb. Because it looks there are many aux things
> in the codes, e.g. AUX area in ring buffer. I'm not sure if we need to change
> all aux to sb. We may do the rename later in separate patch.
Right.. no problem doing that in a separate patch.
> +static void perf_event_sb_mask(unsigned int sb_mask,
> + perf_event_aux_output_cb output,
> + void *data)
> +{
> + int sb;
> +
> + for (sb = 0; sb < sb_nr; sb++) {
> + if (!(sb_mask & (1 << sb)))
> + continue;
> + perf_event_sb_iterate(sb, output, data);
> + }
> +}
> @@ -5852,7 +5910,8 @@ static void perf_event_task(struct task_struct *task,
>
> perf_event_aux(perf_event_task_output,
> &task_event,
> - task_ctx);
> + task_ctx,
> + (1 << sb_task) | (1 << sb_mmap) | (1 << sb_comm));
> }
So one side-effect of this change is that the above event can be
delivered 3 times if you're 'lucky'.
Acme; does userspace care?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists