[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F077058AA5A8@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 14:05:46 +0000
From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>
To: "acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: "ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"eranian@...gle.com" <eranian@...gle.com>,
"vincent.weaver@...ne.edu" <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"acme@...hat.com" <acme@...hat.com>,
"jolsa@...hat.com" <jolsa@...hat.com>,
"alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com"
<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
"ying.huang@...ux.intel.com" <ying.huang@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 1/1] perf/core: don't find side-band event from all
pmus
> > +static void perf_event_sb_mask(unsigned int sb_mask,
> > + perf_event_aux_output_cb output,
> > + void *data)
> > +{
> > + int sb;
> > +
> > + for (sb = 0; sb < sb_nr; sb++) {
> > + if (!(sb_mask & (1 << sb)))
> > + continue;
> > + perf_event_sb_iterate(sb, output, data);
> > + }
> > +}
>
> > @@ -5852,7 +5910,8 @@ static void perf_event_task(struct task_struct
> > *task,
> >
> > perf_event_aux(perf_event_task_output,
> > &task_event,
> > - task_ctx);
> > + task_ctx,
> > + (1 << sb_task) | (1 << sb_mmap) | (1 << sb_comm));
> > }
>
> So one side-effect of this change is that the above event can be delivered
> 3 times if you're 'lucky'.
>
> Acme; does userspace care?
Hi Arnaldo,
Do you think if it's an issue for userspace?
Thanks,
Kan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists